Every time a Burna Boy song plays under a fight scene on HBO, a check gets cut. Every time someone in Atlanta uploads a TikTok using the “Last Last” hook, a fraction of a cent moves through three different rights organizations before landing in a publishing account in Lagos. The money is real, the money is large, and for most of the last decade Nigerian artists were not collecting it.
That has changed. Slowly, awkwardly, with mistakes made on both sides of the Atlantic, the Afrobeats business has woken up to publishing. And publishing, not master royalties, is where the long money lives.
The Four Types of Music Licensing That Pay Out

Before getting into who is making what, it helps to map the field. Music licensing is not one thing. It is four overlapping markets, and each one has its own price list.
Sync licensing covers film, television, video games, trailers, and any other visual content. The fee is paid once, up front, and split between the master owner, meaning the label or the artist, and the publishing owner, meaning the songwriter and publisher. What that fee looks like depends almost entirely on the size of the buyer and how central the song is to the scene. Music supervisors and licensing agents describe the tiers roughly as follows, and every one of them is a negotiating range rather than a fixed price.
| Placement type | Fee range described by supervisors and agents |
|---|---|
| Nigerian indie film | $500 to $5,000 |
| Streaming original series | $5,000 to $50,000 per placement |
| Hollywood feature | $20,000 to $200,000 |
| Hero moment or campaign trailer | Six figures and upward |
| Major brand campaign | $50,000 to $500,000 |
Sample licensing covers what happens when one song uses a recognisable portion of another. Two separate permissions are required, one from the owner of the master recording and one from the owner of the composition, and either party can refuse for any reason or no reason at all. Clearance negotiated before release is a commercial conversation. Clearance negotiated after a record has already broken is something closer to a hostage negotiation, and the default outcome for an artist who sampled without permission and got caught is a fifty-fifty publishing split. Sometimes considerably worse than that.
Interpolation is the cousin of sampling. Instead of using the actual recording, the new artist re-records the melody or lyric. The master clearance vanishes, but the publishing claim does not. Interpolation has become the favored workaround for producers who cannot get a master clearance approved.
Commercial licensing is the brand world. Pepsi, Coca-Cola, Nike, Apple, Samsung. A major global campaign sits at the top of the table above, and the reason those fees run so far ahead of a television placement is that the brand is buying exclusivity as much as music. A song locked into a sportswear campaign for eighteen months cannot appear in a competitor’s advert, cannot soundtrack a rival’s launch, and often cannot be licensed for anything else in the same category anywhere in the world. Tier-two brands and regional campaigns pay considerably less but move in volume, and for a working Afrobeats catalogue the steady drip of regional brand work frequently outperforms the one prestige placement everybody talks about.
Why Publishing Matters More Than Masters

There is a Nigerian shorthand repeated at every label panel. “The master is the engine. The publishing is the building.” A bent metaphor, but the math is sound.
A master royalty pays every time the recording is played. Streams, radio, sync placements, retail. A publishing royalty pays every time the underlying composition is used in any form. That means covers, samples, interpolations, live performances at venues, karaoke, music boxes, and the same streams and sync placements that pay the master.
For a long stretch, Nigerian artists signed master deals that left their publishing on the table. Either it was undefined in the contract, or it was bundled to the label without administration, or it was assigned to a local entity with no infrastructure to collect outside Nigeria. The money was generated. It was just never claimed.
That is the leak the new generation of deals is trying to close, and closing it is unglamorous work. It means registering every song in every territory, chasing collection societies that have no commercial reason to hurry, and reclaiming income that was often absorbed years ago into pools redistributed to better-administered catalogues. There is no press release for any of it. There is only the difference between a catalogue that pays for the rest of a career and one that quietly stops paying the moment the artist stops charting.
The Burna Boy Lesson: “Last Last” and the Toni Braxton Split

“Last Last” sampled Toni Braxton’s “He Wasn’t Man Enough.” Specifically, the chorus melody and a recognizable vocal line. Burna Boy’s team cleared the sample, which means Braxton and her co-writers, along with the original publisher, take a publishing slice every time “Last Last” generates a royalty.
The exact percentage has never been made public, and it will not be. What publishers and clearance lawyers describe for a clean, pre-release clearance of a recognisable vocal hook is a slice somewhere between a quarter and a half of the new song’s publishing. On a track that has streamed into the billions and pulled sync placements of its own, a slice of that size is not a rounding error. It is a property portfolio, paid quarterly, for as long as the song keeps being played.
The lesson is not “do not sample.” The lesson is that when you clear a sample, you are bringing a second writing team into your royalty pool for the life of the song. That is fine when the math works. It is a disaster when it does not.
What Happens When Clearance Goes Wrong

The doomsday version of a sample dispute is the 100% publishing forfeit. A new artist samples without permission, the song breaks, the original rights holders find out, and the clearance is negotiated under duress. In the most punitive settlements, the new song loses its entire publishing claim. The new artist keeps the master royalty, but the song they wrote, technically, belongs to someone else for the rest of its commercial life.
That is the worst case. The middle case, the 50/50 publishing split, is what most uncleared samples end up at when the issue is handled before litigation. The best case is what Burna Boy’s team did. Clear it first, and keep the lion’s share.
The Songwriter Credit Game

The other half of the publishing conversation is co-writing. When a Nigerian artist contributes to an international record, their publishing claim travels with them, assuming someone in the room is keeping a split sheet.
The split sheet is a document, often a single page, that lists every contributor to a song and their agreed percentage. It gets signed at the end of the writing session, before anyone leaves the studio. Without it, the song’s publishing is undefined until someone proves their contribution, which usually means a lawyer, which usually means a smaller piece than the writer would have gotten with a signed page.
Tems is the best modern example at the top of the market. Her co-write on Beyoncé’s “Move” gives her an ongoing publishing share. Her songwriter credit on “Wait for U” with Future and Drake, a song that hit number one on the Billboard Hot 100, generates publishing royalties that arrive quarterly through her administrator. The Disney placement of “Lift Me Up” from “Black Panther: Wakanda Forever” added a sync payment up front and a performance royalty stream every time the film is broadcast.
Rema’s “Calm Down” remix with Selena Gomez followed the same logic. The original song was his. The remix added Gomez’s vocals and required a publishing share for her writing team. A more complicated split sheet, wider commercial reach, and the publishing money flows accordingly.
CKay’s “Love Nwantiti” carries a different lesson. Joeboy co-wrote the chorus, the part that drove its global breakthrough. The credit took time to surface publicly, but the publishing math, once formalized, gave Joeboy a meaningful claim on one of the most-streamed African songs of the last five years.
The PRO Problem and the COSON Workaround

A performance rights organization, or PRO, collects performance royalties on behalf of songwriters. When a song plays on the radio in London, at a stadium in Berlin, at a coffee shop in Brooklyn, the venue or broadcaster pays a licensing fee to a PRO, and the PRO distributes those fees to the writers.
ASCAP and BMI cover the United States. PRS for Music covers the United Kingdom. GEMA covers Germany. SACEM covers France. Almost every country has one or two, and they hold reciprocal agreements with each other, which is the mechanism that lets a writer registered in one territory collect from a broadcast in another. The system is slow, it is bureaucratic, and it distributes on a quarterly lag that can stretch to a year for international income. It also works, which is more than can be said for the alternative most Nigerian writers had until recently.
Nigeria has COSON, the Copyright Society of Nigeria, and the consensus among working artists and their publishing administrators is that COSON does not function as a reliable collection society. Lawsuits, governance disputes, and a thin distribution record have left it unable to collect meaningfully even within Nigeria, let alone reciprocally with international PROs.




