Money laundering cases are spreading all over the world. According to UNODC, the estimated quantity of money laundered globally ranges from 2% to 5%. The most recent transaction screening technology can help businesses efficiently deal with money laundering and terrorism funding issues. Companies can gain a strategic advantage and work with actual clients all over the world this way.
The blog that follows examines the value of transaction screening systems and how firms can utilize them to achieve their goals.
A Quick Look at the Transaction Screening Solution
While forming commercial relationships, financial institutions must adhere to the most recent Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and KYC requirements. The transaction screening solution is appropriate for organizations interacting with high-risk entities like PEPs. According to CFT standards, the technique aids organizations in consumer profiling and risk management at the industrial level.
Transaction screening is a technique that financial institutions use to monitor high-risk transactions by routinely monitoring customer profiles. This is when checking the background and financial profiles comes in handy to analyze the risks and create correct predictions. Because monetary transactions can occur in real-time, an AI-powered transaction screening solution can readily generate Suspicious Activity Reports (SAR).
Transaction Screening System’s Four Phases
The increasing number of crypto-related frauds perplexes business experts and criminals who seek to employ novel digital solutions to gain an immediate return. Transaction Monitoring (TM) is critical for combating criminality in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. The following are the critical steps in the process:
Phase 1: Getting to Understand the Customer
Before entering into commercial agreements, Financial Institutions (FI) must ensure that their risk mitigation structure and Customer Due Diligence (CDD) processes adhere to the AML and CFT guidelines. The provided framework can assist specialists in calculating the risk associated with client profiles. Similarly, FI must ensure data integrity.
Phase 2: Risk-Based Approach
The second stage of transaction screening involves adopting risk-based calibration, which financial organizations can readily adjust based on the specifications of their organizations. Experts can also use back-testing to study earlier data and make predictions. It is very crucial when making changes to the system. This method also makes identifying and investigating fraudulent acts involving data integrity easier.
Phase 3: Implementing the Process
In line with earlier steps, financial institutions must provide quality training for employees who will manage the TM process and receive reports. To decrease human error, financial institutions must provide proper training and direction to their staff. The team must be able to execute pre-transaction inspections and manage alarms properly in order to streamline TM process implementation.
Phase 4: Dealing with the Problems and Enhancing the Performance
When financial firms identify unusual financial activity, concerned specialists must file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) with the administrator. If financial organizations wish to maintain their client relationships, experts must implement innovative risk-mitigation strategies. This transaction screening is also called post-STR measures, and they include reviewing suspicious accounts for adherence from authorities before conducting monetary transactions. Financial organizations can execute Quality Assurance (QA) inspections and manage notifications in this manner. It improves the transaction monitoring process’s robustness.
Because startups and medium-sized businesses will select a cost-friendly deployment, the cloud one will grow dramatically during the specified period. This also allows SMEs to save money on hardware and other technical expenses. Cloud-based systems, in fact, provide SaaS-related security protocols that swiftly safeguard company applications. Companies with limited resources can benefit substantially from this possibility in terms of security investments.
North America will be the biggest revenue-generating jurisdiction for the transaction screening system by area. SMEs in the APAC area will swiftly adopt creative digital solutions to monitor fraudulent transactions and prevent money laundering.
The Bottom Line
Using simple KYC methods to manage risk can result in false positives. Using the most recent transaction screening solution can assist organizations in providing crucial information and proof required for investigating fraudulent transactions. Financial Institutions (FI) must use a cutting-edge KYT system to detect suspicious transactions and reduce the danger of money laundering and terrorism financing. This indicates that FIs must include risk awareness and mitigation methods in order to effectively deploy KYT measures.
